Comments on: Live Microblogging the GWPF with Steve http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/13/live-microblogging-the-gwpf-with-steve/ by Steve McIntyre Mon, 20 May 2013 20:19:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Bernie http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/13/live-microblogging-the-gwpf-with-steve/#comment-235463 Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:55:08 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=11439#comment-235463 Many thanks.

]]> By: Bernie http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/13/live-microblogging-the-gwpf-with-steve/#comment-235462 Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:54:48 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=11439#comment-235462 Nice report. Let me ask the asame questions I did at Omnologos’ blog: SInce George Monbiot is an important opinion leader, hw did he respond to the different presenters? Respectfully? Thoughfully? Condescendingly? Did he see Davies the same way you did – unprepared, uninformed and evasive?

]]> By: Benjamin http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/13/live-microblogging-the-gwpf-with-steve/#comment-235450 Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:23:21 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=11439#comment-235450 Thanks for the quick report on the debate ;)

]]> By: omnologos http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/13/live-microblogging-the-gwpf-with-steve/#comment-235436 Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:47:15 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=11439#comment-235436 that report, of course, is by Latimer Alder

]]> By: Latimer Alder http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/13/live-microblogging-the-gwpf-with-steve/#comment-235435 Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:43:45 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=11439#comment-235435 As I have just been listening to the guff that Bob Watson (1st head of IPCC) has been mouthing about openness and transparency of process at the Guardian Climategate debate tonight, I can only note that there is a big gap between the stated aims and mission of that benighted organisation and its practice.

]]> By: omnologos http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/13/live-microblogging-the-gwpf-with-steve/#comment-235432 Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:39:22 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=11439#comment-235432 I have just received a report about the Guardian debate and published it as a blog post: Report From Climategate Guardian Debate with Monbiot, McIntyre, Pearce, Watson, Keenan and some uea guy

]]> By: Bernie http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/13/live-microblogging-the-gwpf-with-steve/#comment-235422 Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:01:13 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=11439#comment-235422 I look forward to your “colour” commentary!

]]> By: Lucy Skywalker http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/13/live-microblogging-the-gwpf-with-steve/#comment-235409 Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:39:04 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=11439#comment-235409 Re: Benjamin (Jul 14 12:12), does that mean people will lose their fixes of “authoritative” hype that kept them glued to the alarmist position? Or does it mean the IPCC are circling the wagons and holding sessions behind closed doors in order to reach foregone conclusions? Either way, are there signs of the promised transparent openness?

]]> By: Benjamin http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/13/live-microblogging-the-gwpf-with-steve/#comment-235407 Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:12:46 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=11439#comment-235407 The 831 researchers who will contribute to the next round of assessments of climate science and policy options by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have been sent a letter admonishing them to “keep a distance from the media” and send any press inquiries about the work of their author groups to supervisors.

http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/10/climate-panel-struggles-with-media-plan/

]]> By: Dominic http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/13/live-microblogging-the-gwpf-with-steve/#comment-235406 Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:53:25 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=11439#comment-235406 Is there a pre-meeting pub meet for this evening?

]]>