Comments on: McKitrick et al (2010) accepted by Atmos Sci Lett

By: Richard Drake

Richard Drake — Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:21:40 +0000

When you’re in the 97% you have no need to mention the 3% that have proved you wrong. That would give absolutely the wrong impression. Models may indeed have run warm but those who are out in the cold, who have been so rude as to prove it before you wished, shall be held at all times at the same temperature, unmentionable. And that’s consensus science.

By: Bob Koss

Bob Koss — Mon, 03 Dec 2012 04:52:20 +0000

I see Santer finally agrees the models run warm. Naturally he makes no reference to this having been demonstrated two years ago in the paper by McKitrick, McIntyre and Herman.

http://landshape.org/enm/santer-climate-models-are-exaggerating-warming-we-dont-know-why/

By: The Evidence of Failure « the Air Vent

The Evidence of Failure « the Air Vent — Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:08:58 +0000

[...] an acceptable scientist is rather than the science. I am talking about McShane and Wyner 2010 , McKitrick et al (2010), and Lucia’s graphs. What they agree with is the overestimation of the effect of CO2. Some [...]

By: McK, McI and Herman: Congratulations. - My Habari

McK, McI and Herman: Congratulations. - My Habari — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:39:21 +0000

[...] to Steve, Ross and Chad for * **McKitrick, Ross R., Stephen McIntyre and Chad Herman (2010) "Panel and [...]

By: dahuang

dahuang — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:27:54 +0000

McKitrick et al (2010) has been already published online by ASL at WILEY (Early View, Article first published online: 17 SEP 2010). The URL is http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.290/abstract, and DOI: 10.1002/asl.290. A PDF copy of the article could be downloaded at http://ompldr.org/vNWxlOA/McKitrick2010ASL.pdf

By: Weekend Roundup – August 14, 2010 « The Policy Lass

Weekend Roundup – August 14, 2010 « The Policy Lass — Sat, 14 Aug 2010 18:31:57 +0000

[...] at my favorite climate skeptic blog, CA, Steve McIntyre has several posts about his recent co-authored paper reviewing Santer 08′s analysis of the climate [...]

By: The Climate Wars … ending? | Skeptical Swedish Scientists

The Climate Wars … ending? | Skeptical Swedish Scientists — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:57:04 +0000

[...] Well, there is still a huge amount of money and political pressure behind it. But survey after survey now shows that the public are no longer supporting the scare. And though the science has been shown to be lacking, [...]

By: Climate Blog and News Recap: 2010 08 13 « The Whiteboard

Climate Blog and News Recap: 2010 08 13 « The Whiteboard — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:07:54 +0000

[...] Go to comments MMH2010 http://rossmckitrick.weebly.com/uploads/4/8/0/8/4808045/mmh_asl2010.pdf Steve expands on the [...]

By: bluegrue

bluegrue — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:30:35 +0000

Steve, there's something I don't understand. The trends of UAH/RSS are given in the paper as 0.070/0.157 °C/decade in table 1 as 0.079/0.159 °C/decade in table 2 The trends are estimated using different techniques, so I'll accept this results in the differences seen in the tables and figure 2. However, a simple linear regression of monthly data yields 0.138/0.162 °C/decade. Why is the UAH trend only about half its linear trend, whereas RSS is roughly the same?

By: Bernie

Bernie — Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:53:17 +0000

Duster:
I agree, if you can ensure that you can generate more data to test the refined hypothesis or theory.