Comments on: UEA “Welcomes” Untrue Muir Russell Finding

By: UEA and the Muir Russell Cooper Up « Climate Audit

UEA and the Muir Russell Cooper Up « Climate Audit — Tue, 23 Nov 2010 04:58:43 +0000

[...] Sep 14, 2010, after a CA post on the matter on Sep 11, Lisa Williams of UEA wrote Muir Russell, observing that the Muir Russell [...]

By: Muir Russell Tries to Cooper Up Website « Climate Audit

Muir Russell Tries to Cooper Up Website « Climate Audit — Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:02:38 +0000

[...] Palmer of this omission and asked him to notify the Muir Russell inquiry – reported at CA here after the University had added foolishly endorsed the untrue Muir Russell finding on this matter [...]

By: UEA “Welcomes” Untrue Muir Russell Finding | Probe International

UEA “Welcomes” Untrue Muir Russell Finding | Probe International — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:07:06 +0000

[...] Read the original article here [...]

By: IPCC:s undergång | The Climate Scam

IPCC:s undergång | The Climate Scam — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:54:16 +0000

[...] 3) Steve McIntyre kastar än mer ved på brasan genom att bevisa att Oxburgh-rapporten ljugit inför parlamentet då man påstått att en del av det granskade materialet varit rekommenderat av Royal Society. Se här. McIntyre har i tidigare inlägg också hudflängt Muir Russels rapport, se t.ex. här. [...]

By: David Holland

David Holland — Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:54:49 +0000

Re: jeez (Sep 14 17:23), Thanks jeez! My problem is that engineers don't read instructions.

By: jeez

jeez — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:23:14 +0000

Re: David Holland (Sep 14 16:31), Go to Setting>Comments and uncheck hide old comments.

By: David Holland

David Holland — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:31:05 +0000

I have put most of my FoI documents here:
http://www.ventalize.org.uk/FoI/
Doc21 is FOI_08-31

FoI_09-174 I put on What do they know
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/spreadsheet_of_review_comments_f

My Greasemonkey is playing me up. When I enable it I can’t see any comments. Anyone know what I’ve done wrong?

By: PaulM

PaulM — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:30:12 +0000

Re: Lucy Skywalker (Sep 13 03:28), Lucy you have misinterpreted what David is saying. The comment by Steve refers to the following bit.

By: PaulM

PaulM — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:26:37 +0000

David/Steve, Is the full text of FOI 08-31 available somewhere?
We can get some idea from 1212009215.txt (Jones’s “Keith should say” email)
and 1211924186.txt (Osborn to Amman, can we say its confidential)
and of course from your submission but it would be good to see the whole request.
On the site Palmer links to we can see the excuses for not complying
(including protecting the confidentiality of academic intercourse…)
but not exactly what was requested.

By: Lucy Skywalker

Lucy Skywalker — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:28:57 +0000

Re: David Holland (Sep 12 18:47), Thank you very much David for putting all this down here. I think it deserves elevating to its own thread. In fact I'd like to see your whole submission put up as a separate thread somewhere for discussion. It's enough material to kick-start another book to follow Andrew Montfort's Hockey Stick Illusion, in my opinion.

my submission would not be published, as a result of a comment by Steve

Can you elaborate?