Comments on: Steig and the “KNUCKLEHEADED REVIEWERS” http://climateaudit.org/2011/02/13/steig-and-the-knuckleheaded-reviewers/ by Steve McIntyre Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Skiphil http://climateaudit.org/2011/02/13/steig-and-the-knuckleheaded-reviewers/#comment-383910 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:30:44 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=12949#comment-383910 Fascinating to review this thread nearly two years later….. Strikes me that CraigL’s comment is right on target, that there are (a variety of) double standards operating in climate science. Methods and results evaluated post hoc depending upon some separate, prior expectation of the “correct” answers….. aka confirmation bias.

]]> By: Lisbon Workshop on Reconciliation. Part XI: Convinced or Unconvinced? | Climate Etc. http://climateaudit.org/2011/02/13/steig-and-the-knuckleheaded-reviewers/#comment-358302 Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:30:58 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=12949#comment-358302 [...] Steig-O’Donnell  conflagration continues to be volatile, with little hope for [...]

]]> By: Another Alarmist Consensus Achieved! | suyts space http://climateaudit.org/2011/02/13/steig-and-the-knuckleheaded-reviewers/#comment-349745 Sat, 08 Sep 2012 21:01:30 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=12949#comment-349745 [...] but the whole of the continent is not.”  And forget all of the back and forth and Steig demonstrating his cluelessness about statistics.  What did the paper state that he [...]

]]> By: Yeh, But If It Was …….. Then We All Be In Trouble!! | suyts space http://climateaudit.org/2011/02/13/steig-and-the-knuckleheaded-reviewers/#comment-340817 Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:56:06 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=12949#comment-340817 [...] those were good times!  Of course, with this more current map of temp trends, we can see part of the [...]

]]> By: Another nail in AGW coffin…despite peer review hostility | pindanpost http://climateaudit.org/2011/02/13/steig-and-the-knuckleheaded-reviewers/#comment-301076 Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:58:05 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=12949#comment-301076 [...] Steig et al (Antarctica is warming) where Steig himself inappropriately served as a reviewer, and a hostile one at [...]

]]> By: New paper from Lindzen and Choi implies that the models are exaggerating climate sensitivity. | Watts Up With That? http://climateaudit.org/2011/02/13/steig-and-the-knuckleheaded-reviewers/#comment-300996 Wed, 17 Aug 2011 05:52:50 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=12949#comment-300996 [...] Steig et al (Antarctica is warming) where Steig himself inappropriately served as a reviewer, and a hostile one at [...]

]]> By: Polarbeargate: verdrinkende ijsbeerbioloog gereviewed door eigen vrouw http://climateaudit.org/2011/02/13/steig-and-the-knuckleheaded-reviewers/#comment-299904 Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:46:18 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=12949#comment-299904 [...] Warmteperiode werd weggepoest, of de creatie van warmte op de Zuidpool zonder meetstations (Steig et al op cover Nature in 2009, en zijn invloed op de rebuttal).Polarbeargate is nieuwe beeldenstorm in klimaatkerk Laten we nog eens op een rijtje zetten, hoe [...]

]]> By: The warming of Antarctica - Page 2 - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum http://climateaudit.org/2011/02/13/steig-and-the-knuckleheaded-reviewers/#comment-299297 Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:41:55 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=12949#comment-299297 [...] [...]

]]> By: kgnd & Cross-Validation: PART II – Parting Thoughts « the Air Vent http://climateaudit.org/2011/02/13/steig-and-the-knuckleheaded-reviewers/#comment-298995 Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:32:49 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=12949#comment-298995 [...] Apparently, Steig’s post-review change-of-heart includes forgetting that he saw the revised SI with the table removed, forgetting that he knew why it was removed, and forgetting that the only additional request he had with respect to the SI was that we add a few words on iRidge (which we declined to do for reasons stated at the end of this post here). [...]

]]> By: EJ http://climateaudit.org/2011/02/13/steig-and-the-knuckleheaded-reviewers/#comment-255783 Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:55:54 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=12949#comment-255783 What a waste of time and talent.

Steig admits he isn’t a statistition. “… As O’Donnell’s co-authors are fond of pointing out, I am not a statistician, …”

I think this whole fiasco elevates Steig to the level of Mann et all. Completely debunked.

Great to see the reasoned, patient summary by the Master.

Thanks Mr. Steve for all you do!
and JeffID and of course, Ryan

EJ

]]>