Comments on: IPCC and the East Anglia Refusal http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/02/ipcc-and-the-east-anglia-refusal/ by Steve McIntyre Tue, 21 May 2013 15:32:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Punksta http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/02/ipcc-and-the-east-anglia-refusal/#comment-259094 Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:04:19 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13166#comment-259094

Reg. 12(5)(a), Adverse effect on international relations – Release of some information would adversely affect relations with the IPCC

IOW, the UEA is concerned that if the public finds out too much how the IPCC actually operates, public opinion of the IPCC would be lowered, hampering the the IPCC’s ability to function in ways that displease the public.

This very purpose of this regulation, is to ensure that international relations / political correctness is always given prominence over the truth. It should be scrapped forthwith.

]]> By: IPCC and the East Anglia Refusal « Bee Auditor http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/02/ipcc-and-the-east-anglia-refusal/#comment-258641 Sat, 19 Mar 2011 06:29:10 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13166#comment-258641 [...] Source: http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/02/ipcc-and-the-east-anglia-refusal/ [...]

]]> By: Joffre http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/02/ipcc-and-the-east-anglia-refusal/#comment-257733 Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:01:24 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13166#comment-257733 Here is an interesting story about an FOIA request being ignored in a different field. http://www.facebook.com/notes/lyme-disease-film-under-our-skin/cdc-foia-delays-get-under-the-skin-of-film-producers/10150102292483549

Bureaucracies have a way of ignoring inconvenient laws.

]]> By: ManBearPig http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/02/ipcc-and-the-east-anglia-refusal/#comment-257641 Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:12:41 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13166#comment-257641 The next step would be to get the information commissioner to determine if the refusals are within the scope of the law.

]]> By: Timothy Sorenson http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/02/ipcc-and-the-east-anglia-refusal/#comment-257606 Tue, 08 Mar 2011 17:53:06 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13166#comment-257606 This is really important!
We need to read this and read it well and find out
how to apply and enforce this. This goes, in many respects,
beyond FOI.

Steve’s comment that evading emails becomes moot as all documents
fall under this treaty, wrt PUBLIC POLICY decisions.

]]> By: charles the moderator http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/02/ipcc-and-the-east-anglia-refusal/#comment-257573 Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:14:32 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13166#comment-257573 Re: Steve McIntyre (Mar 7 12:04),

You probably want to email him.

]]> By: Al Gored http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/02/ipcc-and-the-east-anglia-refusal/#comment-257530 Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:13:31 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13166#comment-257530 More evidence of Lysenkoism rot, from the USA:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/03/07/climate-ugliness-gets-personal/

With an education system this corrupt, no wonder they graduate the ‘experts’ they do.

]]> By: Steve McIntyre http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/02/ipcc-and-the-east-anglia-refusal/#comment-257489 Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:04:52 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13166#comment-257489 Re: Richard Tol (Mar 6 15:41),

Richard, the strategy of WG1 appears to be that they can evade FOI legislation by setting up a password-protected website for the exchange of information, bypassing email regulations.

]]> By: Bob Valentine Trueman http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/02/ipcc-and-the-east-anglia-refusal/#comment-257483 Mon, 07 Mar 2011 10:56:18 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13166#comment-257483 Just thought I’d let you know that Pachauri’s vision appears to have dimmed; the web link to it doesn’t work. Surprise surprise.

Interesting times, these.

]]> By: matthu http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/02/ipcc-and-the-east-anglia-refusal/#comment-257466 Sun, 06 Mar 2011 21:16:57 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13166#comment-257466 Maybe David Holland stands a better chance resubmitting the request under AEI rules?

]]>