Comments on: Graham Stringer Speaks Out

By: John Whitman

John Whitman — Thu, 17 Mar 2011 04:18:13 +0000

I am jealous of you two guys.

Take good notes of your pub talk!

John

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:03:35 +0000

I’m guessing that Phil Jones actually did try to delete e-mails, but it was the stored “recycle bin” on a server somewhere that tipped someone off. Phil Jones likely handed an unscrupulous and concerned sysadmin exactly what they needed, and knowing the internet as they should, they knew to wash their hands of it by throwing it on a russian server. The blog comments pointing to that link were likely posted under an anonymizer distributed proxy service making tracing it basically impossible at this point.

Hilariously, if someone asks Phil Jones, “Did you delete e-mails?” He can say no, because clearly the e-mails he tried to delete were likely the exact ones that made it out into the public domain. So he couldn’t have deleted them, or else they wouldn’t exist and the inquiry into whether or not he deleted them would not exist. The question is whether or not he tried to delete them.

It might be best at this point to find the leaker and question them. I doubt that will happen though.

By: Josh

Josh — Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:41:06 +0000

See you there! A drink afterwards sounds like a very good idea.

By: Barry Woods

Barry Woods — Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:54:39 +0000

do we wear a special badge? I’m going

By: EdeF

EdeF — Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:53:23 +0000

Almost beyond parody……..but not quite.

By: Latimer Alder

Latimer Alder — Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:10:04 +0000

Graham Stringer will be speaking at the Spectator debate in London on 29 March.

http://www.spectator.co.uk/shop/events/6711083/spectator-debate-the-global-warming-hysteria-is-over-time-for-a-return-to-sanity.thtml

I’m attending and hope to meet some ‘blogamis’ there. We’ll likely go to the pub afterwards to be convivial and put the world to rights. Please join us.

By: theduke

theduke — Tue, 15 Mar 2011 01:43:04 +0000

It’s not just skeptics who have made this observation. Wegman’s Report said much the same thing and he is past chairman of the Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics for the United States National Academy of Sciences.

He’s been smeared like everyone else who challenges the global warming narrative, but that’s fast becoming a badge of honor.

Is Oxburgh next in line to be smeared? Probably not. He’s given them the tepid, inconclusive report they coveted.

By: theduke

theduke — Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:53:08 +0000

Vincit omnia veritas

By: Graham Stringer Speaks Out « Bee Auditor

Graham Stringer Speaks Out « Bee Auditor — Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:30:47 +0000

[...] Source: http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/14/13258/ [...]

By: KnR

KnR — Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:51:13 +0000

The trouble may be that as long as they get the result they need their not to bother about how they get them. Why check you are using the right Stats or using them in the right way if you obtain the expected results. When you combine that with ‘team’ approach designed to exclude others, which provides comfort and self-reinforcement. You can see why they take this approach. However, you are right time and again it’s the statistics which is catching them out and even the rubbish reviews outline this.