<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Light on &#8220;Hide the Decline&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/15/new-light-on-hide-the-decline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/15/new-light-on-hide-the-decline/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:55:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Today’s Climate Warmer than the Medieval and Roman Warm Periods? : CLIMATE HIMALAYA</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/15/new-light-on-hide-the-decline/#comment-344535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Today’s Climate Warmer than the Medieval and Roman Warm Periods? : CLIMATE HIMALAYA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 05:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13265#comment-344535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The researchers argue that &#8220;X-ray densitometry&#8221; enables a more accurate reconstruction of climate history than does analyzing the width of tree rings – the principal data used by MBH. For example, MBH found a &#8220;divergence,&#8221; starting in 1960, between a decline in Northern Hemisphere temperatures, as reconstructed from tree ring data, and the increase in Northern Hemisphere temperatures, as measured by thermometers and other heat sensing instruments. The divergence raises the question of how MBH can be so sure the Medieval Warm Period was tiny or non-existent when their proxy data fail to reflect the instrument-measured warmth of recent decades. To give the hockey stick its alarming looking blade, MBH had to &#8220;hide the decline.&#8221;   [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The researchers argue that &#8220;X-ray densitometry&#8221; enables a more accurate reconstruction of climate history than does analyzing the width of tree rings – the principal data used by MBH. For example, MBH found a &#8220;divergence,&#8221; starting in 1960, between a decline in Northern Hemisphere temperatures, as reconstructed from tree ring data, and the increase in Northern Hemisphere temperatures, as measured by thermometers and other heat sensing instruments. The divergence raises the question of how MBH can be so sure the Medieval Warm Period was tiny or non-existent when their proxy data fail to reflect the instrument-measured warmth of recent decades. To give the hockey stick its alarming looking blade, MBH had to &#8220;hide the decline.&#8221;   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Today&#8217;s Climate Warmer than the Medieval and Roman Warm Periods?</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/15/new-light-on-hide-the-decline/#comment-344477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Today&#8217;s Climate Warmer than the Medieval and Roman Warm Periods?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13265#comment-344477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] warmth of recent decades. To give the hockey stick its alarming looking blade, MBH had to &#8220;hide the decline.&#8221;  In contrast, the Esper team found no divergence between instrumental data [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] warmth of recent decades. To give the hockey stick its alarming looking blade, MBH had to &#8220;hide the decline.&#8221;  In contrast, the Esper team found no divergence between instrumental data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cooler Heads Digest 18 March 2011</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/15/new-light-on-hide-the-decline/#comment-259315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cooler Heads Digest 18 March 2011]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13265#comment-259315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] New Light on Hide the Decline Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit, 15 March 2011 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New Light on Hide the Decline Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit, 15 March 2011 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hide the Decline &#8211; igen &#124; The Climate Scam</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/15/new-light-on-hide-the-decline/#comment-259076</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hide the Decline &#8211; igen &#124; The Climate Scam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13265#comment-259076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] här, här och [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] här, här och [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/15/new-light-on-hide-the-decline/#comment-259010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve McIntyre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 03:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13265#comment-259010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve updated the emulation graphic using a technique of overprinting digital data on the original graphic that I&#039;ve just learned in the past few days. I&#039;ve made an animated sequence to illustrate it better.

This shows clearly that the hide-the-decline here is effective in &lt;strong&gt;1950 &lt;/strong&gt;(rather than 1960) and that the source information is the 4th column (NHD2) in the Briffa et al 1998 archive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve updated the emulation graphic using a technique of overprinting digital data on the original graphic that I&#8217;ve just learned in the past few days. I&#8217;ve made an animated sequence to illustrate it better.</p>
<p>This shows clearly that the hide-the-decline here is effective in <strong>1950 </strong>(rather than 1960) and that the source information is the 4th column (NHD2) in the Briffa et al 1998 archive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Light on ?Hide the Decline? &#171; Bee Auditor</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/15/new-light-on-hide-the-decline/#comment-258865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Light on ?Hide the Decline? &#171; Bee Auditor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13265#comment-258865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source: http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/15/new-light-on-hide-the-decline/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: <a href="http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/15/new-light-on-hide-the-decline/" rel="nofollow">http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/15/new-light-on-hide-the-decline/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El &#8220;consenso&#8221; sobre Calentamiento Global tiene grandes grietas &#124; Desde el exilio</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/15/new-light-on-hide-the-decline/#comment-258848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[El &#8220;consenso&#8221; sobre Calentamiento Global tiene grandes grietas &#124; Desde el exilio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13265#comment-258848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] la curva de Man (al famoso palo de hockey) está masajeada. Lean a Steve McIntyre y sabrán más: 1, 2 y [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] la curva de Man (al famoso palo de hockey) está masajeada. Lean a Steve McIntyre y sabrán más: 1, 2 y [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/15/new-light-on-hide-the-decline/#comment-258808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13265#comment-258808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though probably not from UEA, which hadn&#039;t quite made it into the Russell Group last time I checked.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though probably not from UEA, which hadn&#8217;t quite made it into the Russell Group last time I checked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hide the Decline – the Other Deletion &#124; Another Newyork Times</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/15/new-light-on-hide-the-decline/#comment-258739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hide the Decline – the Other Deletion &#124; Another Newyork Times]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13265#comment-258739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] recently re-visited an article in Science (Briffa and Osborn 1999), that, together with Jones et al 1999 (Rev Geophys), [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently re-visited an article in Science (Briffa and Osborn 1999), that, together with Jones et al 1999 (Rev Geophys), [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hide the Decline &#8211; the Other Deletion &#171; Climate Audit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/15/new-light-on-hide-the-decline/#comment-258734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hide the Decline &#8211; the Other Deletion &#171; Climate Audit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13265#comment-258734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] recently re-visited an article in Science (Briffa and Osborn 1999), that, together with Jones et al 1999 (Rev Geophys), [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently re-visited an article in Science (Briffa and Osborn 1999), that, together with Jones et al 1999 (Rev Geophys), [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
