Comments on: Hide the Decline – the Other Deletion http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/21/hide-the-decline-the-other-deletion/ by Steve McIntyre Mon, 20 May 2013 03:03:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Frontline Responds to complaints about Oct 23 “Climate of Doubt”: Here, the Rebuttal to Frontline that PBS Ombudsman Won’t Put Online | Watts Up With That? http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/21/hide-the-decline-the-other-deletion/#comment-375062 Sun, 18 Nov 2012 00:10:35 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13308#comment-375062 [...] COOK: ClimateGate just a few out-of-context emails — Hardly, Steve McIntyre has plunged into it with mind-blowing detail about how it shows a pattern among that bunch to hide inconvenient truths. [...]

]]> By: Vaya, vaya, “Hide the Decline” es trampa, según confiesa el consenso mismo. « PlazaMoyua.com http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/21/hide-the-decline-the-other-deletion/#comment-313028 Sun, 27 Nov 2011 19:02:51 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13308#comment-313028 [...] en lo de Jeff Id. Es de donde he sacado los emails. El primer gráfico viene de Climate Audit [-->], un trabajo también de esta año sobre el [...]

]]> By: Shock Mann alleged to making false claim about hockey stick http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/21/hide-the-decline-the-other-deletion/#comment-259813 Mon, 04 Apr 2011 06:53:32 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13308#comment-259813 [...] [...]

]]> By: Budget fédéral 2011-2012: pas de quoi écrire à sa mère « lemoutongris http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/21/hide-the-decline-the-other-deletion/#comment-259369 Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:21:10 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13308#comment-259369 [...] 3http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/21/hide-the-decline-the-other-deletion/ [...]

]]> By: Exposed to the light http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/21/hide-the-decline-the-other-deletion/#comment-259306 Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:09:34 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13308#comment-259306 [...] This data comes from a report by Briffa and Osborn in 1999 and was used as evidence to support the Michael Mann hockey stick warming data. Steve McIntrye explains how their computer code shows that they knew this data existed and chose to clip it off. Read the details [...]

]]> By: Hu McCulloch http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/21/hide-the-decline-the-other-deletion/#comment-259233 Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:52:06 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13308#comment-259233 Well put!

]]> By: SteveGinIL http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/21/hide-the-decline-the-other-deletion/#comment-259124 Sat, 26 Mar 2011 21:30:05 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13308#comment-259124 Not an invalid question to ask, all in all. A correlation over a portion of two curves (or perhaps multiple disconnected portions, even) but not elsewhere along them usually is seen as mere coincidence.

]]> By: Publius http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/21/hide-the-decline-the-other-deletion/#comment-259115 Sat, 26 Mar 2011 17:54:11 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13308#comment-259115 “Suggest reasons for” translates to an unknown anthopogenic effect. A couple of probing questions from the “investigators” would have ascertained that the Team really has no clue and is merely speculating. But alas there appears to have been no interest in following this line of inquiry.

]]> By: Hide the Decline – igen | The Climate Scam http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/21/hide-the-decline-the-other-deletion/#comment-259077 Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:11:21 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13308#comment-259077 [...] här, här och [...]

]]> By: kim http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/21/hide-the-decline-the-other-deletion/#comment-259037 Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:52:20 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=13308#comment-259037 I like the term ‘Antidisestablishuniformitarianism’, but I think the ‘too many negatives’ rule met the rule of holes with it.
============

]]>