<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mo Money, Mo Problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2011/05/12/mo-money-mo-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/05/12/mo-money-mo-problems/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: grypo</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/05/12/mo-money-mo-problems/#comment-277303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grypo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 14:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13578#comment-277303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Praying Mantis is likely illusion to Kung Fu, and the perfection of some skill or art.  I doubt many hip-hop scholars would know the reference.  The Beastie Boys used it in reference to basketball at times, but they were also Sonnie Chiba fans.  It has a more individual flavor than anything that it inherent in hip hop culture.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Praying Mantis is likely illusion to Kung Fu, and the perfection of some skill or art.  I doubt many hip-hop scholars would know the reference.  The Beastie Boys used it in reference to basketball at times, but they were also Sonnie Chiba fans.  It has a more individual flavor than anything that it inherent in hip hop culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo Money, Mo Problems &#171; Bee Auditor</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/05/12/mo-money-mo-problems/#comment-276332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mo Money, Mo Problems &#171; Bee Auditor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 08:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13578#comment-276332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source: http://climateaudit.org/2011/05/12/mo-money-mo-problems/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: <a href="http://climateaudit.org/2011/05/12/mo-money-mo-problems/" rel="nofollow">http://climateaudit.org/2011/05/12/mo-money-mo-problems/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Bear</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/05/12/mo-money-mo-problems/#comment-274109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Bear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 11:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13578#comment-274109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay I watched it again, and maybe it&#039;s just me... I agree that the obvious interpretation is pro AGW climate scientists... but I didn&#039;t get that impression at all. If anything the juxtaposition of it all made me feel like they were showing how weak an argument it is to run around proclaiming that you &quot;are a climate scientist&quot; and therefore have all wisdom about it and everyone else is wrong... Maybe I&#039;m reading way too much into it, and the obvious interpretation was the one they wanted. If so, I apologise for confusing anyone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay I watched it again, and maybe it&#8217;s just me&#8230; I agree that the obvious interpretation is pro AGW climate scientists&#8230; but I didn&#8217;t get that impression at all. If anything the juxtaposition of it all made me feel like they were showing how weak an argument it is to run around proclaiming that you &#8220;are a climate scientist&#8221; and therefore have all wisdom about it and everyone else is wrong&#8230; Maybe I&#8217;m reading way too much into it, and the obvious interpretation was the one they wanted. If so, I apologise for confusing anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Bear</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/05/12/mo-money-mo-problems/#comment-274106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Bear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 11:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13578#comment-274106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, I&#039;m saying the real climate scientists agreed to partake in self ridicule (maybe without the knowledge of it). Or at least asides from a few of the people &quot;named&quot; in the vid, most of the others are the normal journalists/cast from Hungry Beast. However, I can see how you could interpret it both ways... but to me it felt like self ridicule at the state of the argument in Australian media circles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I&#8217;m saying the real climate scientists agreed to partake in self ridicule (maybe without the knowledge of it). Or at least asides from a few of the people &#8220;named&#8221; in the vid, most of the others are the normal journalists/cast from Hungry Beast. However, I can see how you could interpret it both ways&#8230; but to me it felt like self ridicule at the state of the argument in Australian media circles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Matthews</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/05/12/mo-money-mo-problems/#comment-274033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Matthews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 06:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13578#comment-274033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL.

Provincial university eh

- Dr Ailie Gallant, a University of Melbourne
- Jason Evans, of the University of New South Wales

Yep.  And where did you get your climatologist qualifications Steve?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL.</p>
<p>Provincial university eh</p>
<p>- Dr Ailie Gallant, a University of Melbourne<br />
- Jason Evans, of the University of New South Wales</p>
<p>Yep.  And where did you get your climatologist qualifications Steve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdeF</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/05/12/mo-money-mo-problems/#comment-273956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EdeF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 01:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13578#comment-273956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think their forte is really rap? They should stick to what they do best..............comic opera.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think their forte is really rap? They should stick to what they do best&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..comic opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publius</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/05/12/mo-money-mo-problems/#comment-273897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Publius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 20:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13578#comment-273897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is something to glean from pop culture&#039;s take on the climate business.  Pop culture as social commentary tends to see the world in terms of scammers and gamers.  It is a starkly competitive and cynical world in which no one really &#039;earns&#039; or &#039;produces&#039; anything; there are just gigs for one person or group to rip off another. So it is no surprise that it would pick up on climate; it would notice that the money flows to and from from the &#039;problems&#039; and that no-problems means no money.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is something to glean from pop culture&#8217;s take on the climate business.  Pop culture as social commentary tends to see the world in terms of scammers and gamers.  It is a starkly competitive and cynical world in which no one really &#8216;earns&#8217; or &#8216;produces&#8217; anything; there are just gigs for one person or group to rip off another. So it is no surprise that it would pick up on climate; it would notice that the money flows to and from from the &#8216;problems&#8217; and that no-problems means no money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Fritsch</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/05/12/mo-money-mo-problems/#comment-273844</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenneth Fritsch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 15:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13578#comment-273844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Craig Bear, I’m not sure if you’re being serious, but if so, you are incorrect. They are in fact climate scientists and they most certainly are not spoofing climate scientists. Simpler explanation of the evidence: they are climate scientists parodying skeptics and making fools of themselves in the process. Maybe you got that and I thought you were being serious.&quot;

In all the lack of seriousness that the video exudes, I would not think that we should take its message very seriously, either.  To do an intentional parody on ones selves would require a great amount confidence and/or hubris.  Doing an unintentional self parody (as seen by outsiders) is often the bane of the arrogant, but nevertheless no less humorous than if it were intentional.  I am not at all into rapping, but I know lame rapping when I see it. I would think that these intelligent climate scientists would also see that and I would suspect that at least some, after viewing the finished product and in context, would see the irony portrayed in the video of the scientist getting far afield and into obviously unfamiliar venues in attempts to make advocacy points.

There was a comedy routine on SNL where an arrogant character would have said in the context of this video and summed up its message rather well: &quot;I am a climate scientist and you are not&quot;.  Well,  I am Kenneth Fritsch and you are not. Now for the next question in the climate &quot;science&quot; debates.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Craig Bear, I’m not sure if you’re being serious, but if so, you are incorrect. They are in fact climate scientists and they most certainly are not spoofing climate scientists. Simpler explanation of the evidence: they are climate scientists parodying skeptics and making fools of themselves in the process. Maybe you got that and I thought you were being serious.&#8221;</p>
<p>In all the lack of seriousness that the video exudes, I would not think that we should take its message very seriously, either.  To do an intentional parody on ones selves would require a great amount confidence and/or hubris.  Doing an unintentional self parody (as seen by outsiders) is often the bane of the arrogant, but nevertheless no less humorous than if it were intentional.  I am not at all into rapping, but I know lame rapping when I see it. I would think that these intelligent climate scientists would also see that and I would suspect that at least some, after viewing the finished product and in context, would see the irony portrayed in the video of the scientist getting far afield and into obviously unfamiliar venues in attempts to make advocacy points.</p>
<p>There was a comedy routine on SNL where an arrogant character would have said in the context of this video and summed up its message rather well: &#8220;I am a climate scientist and you are not&#8221;.  Well,  I am Kenneth Fritsch and you are not. Now for the next question in the climate &#8220;science&#8221; debates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kim</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/05/12/mo-money-mo-problems/#comment-273837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 15:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13578#comment-273837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not a climate scientist but I holiday in thunderstorms.
===========]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a climate scientist but I holiday in thunderstorms.<br />
===========</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/05/12/mo-money-mo-problems/#comment-273753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 10:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13578#comment-273753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Bro do yah know
Dey use dem tricks to make us dicks
Tell em its no line de swine
To hide dat decline.
Rap is crap?
(or my rap lines are crap?)
:-(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bro do yah know<br />
Dey use dem tricks to make us dicks<br />
Tell em its no line de swine<br />
To hide dat decline.<br />
Rap is crap?<br />
(or my rap lines are crap?) <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
