<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Built Like an &#8220;Outhouse&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2011/06/08/built-like-an-outhouse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/06/08/built-like-an-outhouse/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:39:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul_in_CT</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/06/08/built-like-an-outhouse/#comment-293698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul_in_CT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13807#comment-293698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funniest post ever, many thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funniest post ever, many thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Drake</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/06/08/built-like-an-outhouse/#comment-285346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Drake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13807#comment-285346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Showing that these guys really &#039;believe it&#039;, where &#039;it&#039; is hard to specify exactly but sure is catastrophic. Whatever shortcuts (at worst, deceptions) are uncovered in the science this must be kept in mind. It&#039;s not a scam in the most facile sense. Noble cause corruption some call it, though I&#039;ve never gone that far. Jeff&#039;s two-level outhouse has become my model.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Showing that these guys really &#8216;believe it&#8217;, where &#8216;it&#8217; is hard to specify exactly but sure is catastrophic. Whatever shortcuts (at worst, deceptions) are uncovered in the science this must be kept in mind. It&#8217;s not a scam in the most facile sense. Noble cause corruption some call it, though I&#8217;ve never gone that far. Jeff&#8217;s two-level outhouse has become my model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Drake</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/06/08/built-like-an-outhouse/#comment-285343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Drake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13807#comment-285343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim, thanks for that. It&#039;s time we had a bit more Tolstoy around here. The epic quality, but with a fox&#039;s grasp of the detail (if you follow Berlin in seeing the novelist as a fox who longed to be a hedgehog). We need both of those. As for our host, it&#039;s like a cross between Leo Nikolayevich and  Perelman. Hilarious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, thanks for that. It&#8217;s time we had a bit more Tolstoy around here. The epic quality, but with a fox&#8217;s grasp of the detail (if you follow Berlin in seeing the novelist as a fox who longed to be a hedgehog). We need both of those. As for our host, it&#8217;s like a cross between Leo Nikolayevich and  Perelman. Hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Fritsch</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/06/08/built-like-an-outhouse/#comment-285338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenneth Fritsch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13807#comment-285338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Bradley interview linked above it is rather obvious that Bradley is and has been very much the advocate/scientist.  That he plays the politics well is evident in his attempt to portray the scientist/advocate as a victim and state that scientists must now become advocates for the cause.  In other words, these scientists have been quietly going about their businesses, and have been pulled into the debate unwillingly - and apparently forced Bradley to write a book about it. 

Washington politicians can indeed be pompous and overbearing in their hearings, but I think all that does is allow scientists like Bradley to avoid discussing the details of the evidence and change the subject to their being victims. Why would a scientist refer to a works of theirs as being robust like a brick outhouse?  That is a metaphor expected of a politician with no content.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Bradley interview linked above it is rather obvious that Bradley is and has been very much the advocate/scientist.  That he plays the politics well is evident in his attempt to portray the scientist/advocate as a victim and state that scientists must now become advocates for the cause.  In other words, these scientists have been quietly going about their businesses, and have been pulled into the debate unwillingly &#8211; and apparently forced Bradley to write a book about it. </p>
<p>Washington politicians can indeed be pompous and overbearing in their hearings, but I think all that does is allow scientists like Bradley to avoid discussing the details of the evidence and change the subject to their being victims. Why would a scientist refer to a works of theirs as being robust like a brick outhouse?  That is a metaphor expected of a politician with no content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Anderson</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/06/08/built-like-an-outhouse/#comment-285237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Anderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13807#comment-285237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would have compared the Hockey Stick to a stool you might find in an outhouse, given its propensity to bend in compliance with more recent reconstructions...

http://i55.tinypic.com/2rm2gdw.jpg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have compared the Hockey Stick to a stool you might find in an outhouse, given its propensity to bend in compliance with more recent reconstructions&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://i55.tinypic.com/2rm2gdw.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i55.tinypic.com/2rm2gdw.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monty</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/06/08/built-like-an-outhouse/#comment-285224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[monty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13807#comment-285224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Odd that &#039;hockey sticks&#039; turn up in lots of other proxies which aren&#039;t associated with tree rings (glacier length records, ocean floor foram records, permafrost temperatures, borehole records, ammonium concentrations from tropical ice cores, sediment fluxes to valley bottoms).  Maybe they exist after all?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odd that &#8216;hockey sticks&#8217; turn up in lots of other proxies which aren&#8217;t associated with tree rings (glacier length records, ocean floor foram records, permafrost temperatures, borehole records, ammonium concentrations from tropical ice cores, sediment fluxes to valley bottoms).  Maybe they exist after all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/06/08/built-like-an-outhouse/#comment-285186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13807#comment-285186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Article describing the hike is ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article describing the hike is </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Haigh</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/06/08/built-like-an-outhouse/#comment-285165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy Haigh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13807#comment-285165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Worked it out with a hockey stick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worked it out with a hockey stick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Climate Change debate - Page 400 - PPRuNe Forums</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/06/08/built-like-an-outhouse/#comment-285130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Climate Change debate - Page 400 - PPRuNe Forums]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 06:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13807#comment-285130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Sherrington</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2011/06/08/built-like-an-outhouse/#comment-285107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff Sherrington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 04:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=13807#comment-285107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mountains in Australia do not rise higher than 7,310 feet, so we use gravitational priciples and send it downwards in the famous &quot;long drop&quot;. There have been several photographic and descriptive books on the Australian Dunny, with the earliest, I think, being:
Dunnies, dykes and longdrops / Douglass Baglin, Yvonne Austin
Book Bib ID 1332676 Format Book,  Online - Google Books 
Author Baglin, Douglass, 1926-   Edition 1st ed. Description Auckland, N.Z. : Beckett-Sterling ; Brookvale, N.S.W. : Child &amp; Henry Publishing, 1984. 55 p. : ill. (some col.) ; 24 cm. ISBN 0908676107 Subjects Outhouses - Pictorial works.

Feom Wikipedia, we have this 1960s photo. pre-sewerage, of lines of dunnies in Brisbane, showing how thorough we were in replicating experiments. Wiki also gives the origin of &quot;dunny&quot;, &quot;thunderbox&quot;, &quot;long drop&quot;, &quot;dyke&quot;, &quot;crapper&quot;, &quot;bog&quot; and other synonyms.  

http://www.geoffstuff.com/Dunnies.jpg

Once again, the NH and the SH might have to be treated as discrete cases (of crap).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mountains in Australia do not rise higher than 7,310 feet, so we use gravitational priciples and send it downwards in the famous &#8220;long drop&#8221;. There have been several photographic and descriptive books on the Australian Dunny, with the earliest, I think, being:<br />
Dunnies, dykes and longdrops / Douglass Baglin, Yvonne Austin<br />
Book Bib ID 1332676 Format Book,  Online &#8211; Google Books<br />
Author Baglin, Douglass, 1926-   Edition 1st ed. Description Auckland, N.Z. : Beckett-Sterling ; Brookvale, N.S.W. : Child &amp; Henry Publishing, 1984. 55 p. : ill. (some col.) ; 24 cm. ISBN 0908676107 Subjects Outhouses &#8211; Pictorial works.</p>
<p>Feom Wikipedia, we have this 1960s photo. pre-sewerage, of lines of dunnies in Brisbane, showing how thorough we were in replicating experiments. Wiki also gives the origin of &#8220;dunny&#8221;, &#8220;thunderbox&#8221;, &#8220;long drop&#8221;, &#8220;dyke&#8221;, &#8220;crapper&#8221;, &#8220;bog&#8221; and other synonyms.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.geoffstuff.com/Dunnies.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.geoffstuff.com/Dunnies.jpg</a></p>
<p>Once again, the NH and the SH might have to be treated as discrete cases (of crap).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
