Comments on: BEST Singletons http://climateaudit.org/2011/10/29/best-singletons/ by Steve McIntyre Tue, 21 May 2013 15:32:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Steven Mosher http://climateaudit.org/2011/10/29/best-singletons/#comment-307751 Sun, 30 Oct 2011 00:44:35 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=14805#comment-307751 When you process down to daily data you get singletons.

]]> By: Willis Eschenbach http://climateaudit.org/2011/10/29/best-singletons/#comment-307750 Sun, 30 Oct 2011 00:24:28 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=14805#comment-307750 The singleton 137533 also has a frequency of 1.

w.

]]> By: Dmitry http://climateaudit.org/2011/10/29/best-singletons/#comment-307724 Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:47:54 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=14805#comment-307724 Well, according to their main paper, “A further 0.2% of data was eliminated because after cutting and filtering the resulting record was either too short to process (minimum length ≥6 months)…”. I guess it means that singletons were kicked out as well.

]]> By: BillC http://climateaudit.org/2011/10/29/best-singletons/#comment-307716 Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:14:44 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=14805#comment-307716 I see that record (#137533) in my data and can confirm it’s a singleton.

137532 1 1970.125 12.187 0 28 18
137533 1 1966.208 6.575 0 28 18
137534 1 1836.042 9.259 0 -99 -99

Interestingly, I count 126 singleton stations in the US. So only 4 more worldwide? Something about one of the US data sources?

]]>