Comments on: Un-Muddying the Waters http://climateaudit.org/2011/11/07/un-muddying-the-waters/ by Steve McIntyre Wed, 22 May 2013 20:55:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Klotzbach Revisited | My view on climate change http://climateaudit.org/2011/11/07/un-muddying-the-waters/#comment-402280 Fri, 01 Mar 2013 19:55:25 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=14907#comment-402280 [...] The Idso’s on CO2Science – Blog Roger Pielke Jr.: here, here and here – ClimateAudit – SkepticalScience: here and here – RealClimate: here and here – Press release Po-Chedly en Fu – [...]

]]> By: Klotzbach et al revisited, a reply by John Christy | Watts Up With That? http://climateaudit.org/2011/11/07/un-muddying-the-waters/#comment-401417 Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:21:41 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=14907#comment-401417 [...] the ratio over global land to be 1.1, and this was confirmed by independent analysis (see http://climateaudit.org/2011/11/07/un-muddying-the-waters/).  Hagelaars follows an early calculation by Gavin Schmidt, claiming the land value should be [...]

]]> By: Klotzbach revisited, a reply by John Christy « De staat van het klimaat http://climateaudit.org/2011/11/07/un-muddying-the-waters/#comment-401409 Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:38:26 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=14907#comment-401409 [...] the ratio over global land to be 1.1, and this was confirmed by independent analysis (see http://climateaudit.org/2011/11/07/un-muddying-the-waters/).  Hagelaars follows an early calculation by Gavin Schmidt, claiming the land value should be [...]

]]> By: Klotzbach Revisited | Klimaatverandering http://climateaudit.org/2011/11/07/un-muddying-the-waters/#comment-399904 Fri, 08 Feb 2013 14:18:56 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=14907#comment-399904 [...] en dergelijke, zie: – De Idso’s op CO2Science – Blog Roger Pielke Jr.: hier, hier en hier – ClimateAudit – SkepticalScience: hier en hier – RealClimate: hier en hier – Press release Po-Chedly en Fu – MET [...]

]]> By: Hu McCulloch http://climateaudit.org/2011/11/07/un-muddying-the-waters/#comment-324690 Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:03:13 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=14907#comment-324690 I’ve just added some further comments on TLS, EIV, and “Attenuation-Corrected LS” on Roman’s blog at http://statpad.wordpress.com/2010/12/19/eivtls-regression-why-use-it/#comment-1257 .

I include some discussion of the Technical Note on correcting for signual attenuation by Ammann, Genton and Li in Climate of the Past (2010).

]]> By: Hu McCulloch http://climateaudit.org/2011/11/07/un-muddying-the-waters/#comment-323143 Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:33:12 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=14907#comment-323143 I’ve now posted an extensive comment on TLS versus what I call “Adjusted OLS” as solutions to the EIV problem over on Roman’s site at
http://statpad.wordpress.com/2010/12/19/eivtls-regression-why-use-it/#comment-1167 .

]]> By: kim http://climateaudit.org/2011/11/07/un-muddying-the-waters/#comment-318145 Fri, 23 Dec 2011 14:52:25 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=14907#comment-318145 It’s as amusing as heck to watch Carrick try to speak Willard’s language over @ Jeff’s.
=============

]]> By: steven mosher http://climateaudit.org/2011/11/07/un-muddying-the-waters/#comment-318061 Fri, 23 Dec 2011 03:37:31 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=14907#comment-318061 you again miss the point. i do not object based on the author. You can of provide evidence that I do object. But when I say I dont object, that is an act of not objecting.

There is no assertion. There is a request to look at the evidence.

You wont. that is your choice.

Others will take the suggestion.

When they do they will come to a conclusion.

That conclusion will allow them to draw a conclusion about your refusal

]]> By: Further Confirmation Of Klotzbach Et Al 2009 | Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. http://climateaudit.org/2011/11/07/un-muddying-the-waters/#comment-317897 Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:01:57 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=14907#comment-317897 [...] Un-Muddying the Waters [...]

]]> By: RuhRoh http://climateaudit.org/2011/11/07/un-muddying-the-waters/#comment-315129 Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:19:42 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=14907#comment-315129 Perhaps related to this post;

http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/6/4/044022

Tamino and Rahmstorf at it again.
RR

]]>