Comments on: Watch the Pea – AR5 (ZOD) Chapter 10

By: Niche Modeling » Snowballing Bias and Corruption

Niche Modeling » Snowballing Bias and Corruption — Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:56:10 +0000

[...] written a couple of posts on the blatant bias in the AR5 draft, one of the most obvious being the suppression of his and McKitrick’s peer-reviewed paper demolishing a Santer defense of climate models. As [...]

By: gallopingcamel

gallopingcamel — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:51:59 +0000

You appear to have access to the IPCC’s AR5 draft. Is this still available on the Internet. If not could you send a copy to:
info@gallopingcamel.info?

By: thomaswfuller

thomaswfuller — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 22:51:24 +0000

Many thanks.

By: Mentiras científicas descaradas (también) en el próximo informe del IPCC. Hay que cerrarlo. « PlazaMoyua.com

Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:51:22 +0000

[...] Watch the Pea – AR5 Chapter 10 [...]

By: Hu McCulloch

Hu McCulloch — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:42:37 +0000

Can we nominate people, or do they have to volunteer?

By: Richard Drake

Richard Drake — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:17:15 +0000

The cartoonist Josh is a friend and I take exception to your language.

By: Steve McIntyre

Steve McIntyre — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:22:24 +0000

Reviewer registration is at https://fod.ipcc.unibe.ch/registration/

By: jeff id

jeff id — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 01:26:51 +0000

There are some fun quotes in the CG2 emails about ‘increased probability’ of failing confidence intervals as time goes on. I don’t have them handy but the abuse of stats looks more like incompetence than I’ve ever understood before.

By: Bernie

Bernie — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 01:17:27 +0000

Steve:
Do you know who are the reviewers for Chapter 10?

By: diogenes

diogenes — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:46:01 +0000

I’m glad you are capable of that amount of double-think, Bob, you should consider editing wikipedia when Connolley has to take leave of absence