<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another IPCC Demand for Secrecy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2012/01/26/another-ipcc-demand-for-secrecy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/01/26/another-ipcc-demand-for-secrecy/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: UN IPCC Report Shows Man-made Global Warming is a Hoax at US Action News</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/01/26/another-ipcc-demand-for-secrecy/#comment-399762</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UN IPCC Report Shows Man-made Global Warming is a Hoax at US Action News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=15485#comment-399762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] IPCC&#8217;s official reason for wanting secrecy (as they explained it to Steve McIntyre in  January 2012) is so that criticisms of the drafts are not spread out across the internet but get funneled [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IPCC&#8217;s official reason for wanting secrecy (as they explained it to Steve McIntyre in  January 2012) is so that criticisms of the drafts are not spread out across the internet but get funneled [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UN admits Solar Activity plays significant role in Global Warming &#124; Politisite</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/01/26/another-ipcc-demand-for-secrecy/#comment-399144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UN admits Solar Activity plays significant role in Global Warming &#124; Politisite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 01:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=15485#comment-399144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] IPCC&#8217;s official reason for wanting secrecy (as they explained it to Steve McIntyre in  January 2012) is so that criticisms of the drafts are not spread out across the internet but get funneled [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IPCC&#8217;s official reason for wanting secrecy (as they explained it to Steve McIntyre in  January 2012) is so that criticisms of the drafts are not spread out across the internet but get funneled [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leaked IPCC Climate Report Excites Skeptics, Annoys Authors And Raises Questions About Process &#124; earth 911 broadcast network</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/01/26/another-ipcc-demand-for-secrecy/#comment-386615</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leaked IPCC Climate Report Excites Skeptics, Annoys Authors And Raises Questions About Process &#124; earth 911 broadcast network]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 03:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=15485#comment-386615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] veil of secrecy over the drafting process, while diligently defended by the IPCC, has been criticized by stakeholders and observers on all fronts, with many suggesting [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] veil of secrecy over the drafting process, while diligently defended by the IPCC, has been criticized by stakeholders and observers on all fronts, with many suggesting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosmic Rays Replace CO2 as Driver For Climate Change and Global Warming &#171; GeoEngineering Exposed</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/01/26/another-ipcc-demand-for-secrecy/#comment-386248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cosmic Rays Replace CO2 as Driver For Climate Change and Global Warming &#171; GeoEngineering Exposed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=15485#comment-386248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] IPCC&#8217;s official reason for wanting secrecy (as they explained it to Steve McIntyre in  January 2012) is so that criticisms of the drafts are not spread out across the internet but get funneled [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IPCC&#8217;s official reason for wanting secrecy (as they explained it to Steve McIntyre in  January 2012) is so that criticisms of the drafts are not spread out across the internet but get funneled [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The IPCC said in a statement today that the leak “interferes” with the drafting process, and that the report is a “work in progress.” &#171; Pulled from the wreckage of your silent reverie</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/01/26/another-ipcc-demand-for-secrecy/#comment-385942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The IPCC said in a statement today that the leak “interferes” with the drafting process, and that the report is a “work in progress.” &#171; Pulled from the wreckage of your silent reverie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 01:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=15485#comment-385942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] IPCC&#8217;s official reason for wanting secrecy (as they explained it to Steve McIntyre in January 2012) is so that criticisms of the drafts are not spread out across the internet but get funneled [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IPCC&#8217;s official reason for wanting secrecy (as they explained it to Steve McIntyre in January 2012) is so that criticisms of the drafts are not spread out across the internet but get funneled [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Warming: IPCC AR5 draft leaked, contains game-changing admission of enhanced&#032;&#045;&#032;ALIPAC</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/01/26/another-ipcc-demand-for-secrecy/#comment-385913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global Warming: IPCC AR5 draft leaked, contains game-changing admission of enhanced&#032;&#045;&#032;ALIPAC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=15485#comment-385913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Climate Change Report Leaked &#124; &#34;Global Possibilities&#34;</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/01/26/another-ipcc-demand-for-secrecy/#comment-385578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global Climate Change Report Leaked &#124; &#34;Global Possibilities&#34;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 22:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=15485#comment-385578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] veil of secrecy over the drafting process, while diligently defended by the IPCC, has been criticized by stakeholders and observers on all fronts, with many suggesting [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] veil of secrecy over the drafting process, while diligently defended by the IPCC, has been criticized by stakeholders and observers on all fronts, with many suggesting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Climate Panel Report Leaked &#124; Elm River Free Press</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/01/26/another-ipcc-demand-for-secrecy/#comment-385456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global Climate Panel Report Leaked &#124; Elm River Free Press]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=15485#comment-385456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] veil of secrecy over the drafting process, while diligently defended by the IPCC, has been criticized by stakeholders and observers on all fronts, with many suggesting [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] veil of secrecy over the drafting process, while diligently defended by the IPCC, has been criticized by stakeholders and observers on all fronts, with many suggesting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IPCC AR5 draft leaked, contains game-changing admission of enhanced solar forcing &#124; Sovereign Independent UK</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/01/26/another-ipcc-demand-for-secrecy/#comment-385206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IPCC AR5 draft leaked, contains game-changing admission of enhanced solar forcing &#124; Sovereign Independent UK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=15485#comment-385206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] IPCC’s official reason for wanting secrecy (as they explained it to Steve McIntyre in  January 2012) is so that criticisms of the drafts are not spread out across the internet but get funneled [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IPCC’s official reason for wanting secrecy (as they explained it to Steve McIntyre in  January 2012) is so that criticisms of the drafts are not spread out across the internet but get funneled [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skiphil</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/01/26/another-ipcc-demand-for-secrecy/#comment-384789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skiphil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=15485#comment-384789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops, this one is not working out so well for the opponents of transparency.... SOD of AR5 now linked at WUWT, BH, etc.

Why couldn&#039;t the IPCC adopt genuine transparency in the first place?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, this one is not working out so well for the opponents of transparency&#8230;. SOD of AR5 now linked at WUWT, BH, etc.</p>
<p>Why couldn&#8217;t the IPCC adopt genuine transparency in the first place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
