http://rankexploits.com/musings/2013/richard-comment-doesnt-claim-didnt-email-deniers/#comment-111703

When they knew Hanich was the contacting person that
1) Confirmed Lewandowsky never contacted them
2) Confirmed a member of the team had contacted them
3) Confirmed those who said Lewandowsky has not contacted them were truthful.
4) Confirmed JoAnn Nova’s list of people not contacted Lewandowsky was accurate.
5) Confirmed that contact with skeptic and non-skeptc blogs exhibited differential treatment.
6) And Lewandowsky’s response gave us more evidence of the sort of weasel he is.

Update on bizarre aspects of Lewandowsky et al (20???) “Moon Landing” paper and the subsequent “Recursive Fury” paper…. can anyone obtain an honest accounting of the review and publication status of these two papers?

A.Scott at WUWT on dubious publication status of TWO Lewandowsky papers

…To review – the original Lewandowsky 2012 “Moon Landing” paper, which Lewandowsky, Cook et al, have claimed since July 2012, to be; peer reviewed accepted for publication by, and “in press” with, Psychological Science has not seen a one of those claims acknowledged or confirmed. The paper has not been published and no acknowledgement has been made by the journal of its acceptance.

And the same type questionable conduct and issues are arising on the follow on “Recursive” paper as well.

And all the while the authors of “Moon Landing still have failed/refused to provide the Supplemental Online documentation they claim contains the information necessary to verify and validate their work.

These are simple, honest, fair questions. Each and every one ignored.

Steve: Psychological Science (journal) has a long lead time from article acceptance to appearance in print. I think that Scott is drawing conclusions from the long delay when none should be drawn. However, he is correct that Lewandowsky has both failed to place a proper archive online and that Lewandowsky has refused to provide complete data to perceived critics. (Including me. Lewandowsky has refused to provide complete data. And the journal editor Eric Eich of U of Victoria has refused to require Lewandowsky to do so.)

http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/obsonline/q-a-with-psychological-scientist-stephan-lewandowsky-part-2.html

Funny that it appears on the website of the same journal, Psychological Science…. Can you say irony??

A version of the PDF of the paper does appear on a website called psychologyforasafeclimate.org . It appears to be identical to the original. Because the last modification date was 8/27 none of changes that were requested by Jeff Id have been addressed.