<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The SkS &#8220;Link&#8221; to the Lewandowsky Survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 02:33:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skiphil</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/#comment-409656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skiphil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=16759#comment-409656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since Lewandowsky is already on record (last Sept.) insisting that various bloggers should have perfect email records and instant recall for any unsolicited two-year old request(s) from his assistant Hanich, Lew has unwittingly set the performance bar very high for himself.

While the skeptic bloggers had no reason in 2010 to know the name Hanich and recall it two years later (or even Lewandowsky), or to care about a spammy request from the obscure Univ. of Western Australia, Lewandowsky reviles and ridicules them for not instantly sorting out the long lost details two years later.

Yet, Lewandowsky and Cook, still cannot now (after 7 months of opportunity and requests) provide a precise, accurate accounting of the details of their own studies and email correspondence pertaining to such work.

Thus, by the standard Lewandowsky himself proclaimed for assessing the bloggers, he is himself incompetent (or worse).  Same goes for John Cook and co-authors....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Lewandowsky is already on record (last Sept.) insisting that various bloggers should have perfect email records and instant recall for any unsolicited two-year old request(s) from his assistant Hanich, Lew has unwittingly set the performance bar very high for himself.</p>
<p>While the skeptic bloggers had no reason in 2010 to know the name Hanich and recall it two years later (or even Lewandowsky), or to care about a spammy request from the obscure Univ. of Western Australia, Lewandowsky reviles and ridicules them for not instantly sorting out the long lost details two years later.</p>
<p>Yet, Lewandowsky and Cook, still cannot now (after 7 months of opportunity and requests) provide a precise, accurate accounting of the details of their own studies and email correspondence pertaining to such work.</p>
<p>Thus, by the standard Lewandowsky himself proclaimed for assessing the bloggers, he is himself incompetent (or worse).  Same goes for John Cook and co-authors&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lew paper &#8230; flushed &#124; pindanpost</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/#comment-407982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lew paper &#8230; flushed &#124; pindanpost]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 08:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=16759#comment-407982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Last fall, Geoff Chambers and Barry Woods established beyond a shadow of a doubt that no blog post linking to the Lewandowsky survey had ever been published at the Skeptical Science (SKS) blog. Chambers reasonably suggested at the time that the authors correct the claim in the article to reflect the lack of any link at the SKS blog. I reviewed the then available information on this incident in September 2012 here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last fall, Geoff Chambers and Barry Woods established beyond a shadow of a doubt that no blog post linking to the Lewandowsky survey had ever been published at the Skeptical Science (SKS) blog. Chambers reasonably suggested at the time that the authors correct the claim in the article to reflect the lack of any link at the SKS blog. I reviewed the then available information on this incident in September 2012 here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lew &#38; Cook: economical with the truth &#171; Australian Climate Madness</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/#comment-407879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lew &#38; Cook: economical with the truth &#171; Australian Climate Madness]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 23:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=16759#comment-407879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Last fall, Geoff Chambers and Barry Woods established beyond a shadow of a doubt that no blog post linking to the Lewandowsky survey had ever been published at the Skeptical Science (SKS) blog. Chambers reasonably suggested at the time that the authors correct the claim in the article to reflect the lack of any link at the SKS blog. I reviewed the then available information on this incident in September 2012 here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last fall, Geoff Chambers and Barry Woods established beyond a shadow of a doubt that no blog post linking to the Lewandowsky survey had ever been published at the Skeptical Science (SKS) blog. Chambers reasonably suggested at the time that the authors correct the claim in the article to reflect the lack of any link at the SKS blog. I reviewed the then available information on this incident in September 2012 here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McIntyre&#8217;s dissection of the Cook-Lewandowsky &#8220;Lying/deceiving/incompetence&#8221; complex &#124; Watts Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/#comment-407770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[McIntyre&#8217;s dissection of the Cook-Lewandowsky &#8220;Lying/deceiving/incompetence&#8221; complex &#124; Watts Up With That?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=16759#comment-407770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Last fall, Geoff Chambers and Barry Woods established beyond a shadow of a doubt that no blog post linking to the Lewandowsky survey had ever been published at the Skeptical Science (SKS) blog. Chambers reasonably suggested at the time that the authors correct the claim in the article to reflect the lack of any link at the SKS blog. I reviewed the then available information on this incident in September 2012 here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last fall, Geoff Chambers and Barry Woods established beyond a shadow of a doubt that no blog post linking to the Lewandowsky survey had ever been published at the Skeptical Science (SKS) blog. Chambers reasonably suggested at the time that the authors correct the claim in the article to reflect the lack of any link at the SKS blog. I reviewed the then available information on this incident in September 2012 here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewandowsky Doubles Down &#171; Climate Audit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/#comment-407767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lewandowsky Doubles Down &#171; Climate Audit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=16759#comment-407767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Last fall, Geoff Chambers and Barry Woods established beyond a shadow of a doubt that no blog post linking to the Lewandowsky survey had ever been published at the Skeptical Science (SKS) blog. Chambers reasonably suggested at the time that the authors correct the claim in the article to reflect the lack of any link at the SKS blog. I reviewed the then available information on this incident in September 2012 here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last fall, Geoff Chambers and Barry Woods established beyond a shadow of a doubt that no blog post linking to the Lewandowsky survey had ever been published at the Skeptical Science (SKS) blog. Chambers reasonably suggested at the time that the authors correct the claim in the article to reflect the lack of any link at the SKS blog. I reviewed the then available information on this incident in September 2012 here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewandowsky Timeline &#124; Geoffchambers&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/#comment-407126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lewandowsky Timeline &#124; Geoffchambers&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=16759#comment-407126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/" rel="nofollow">http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan Lewandowsky and John Cook &#8211; making things up &#124; Watts Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/#comment-403625</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephan Lewandowsky and John Cook &#8211; making things up &#124; Watts Up With That?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 17:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=16759#comment-403625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;If it&#8217;s true they are selectively blocking, I have to begrudgingly respect the skill with which they are playing this audience: there is no way for anyone to complain without matching the stereotypical conspiracist of the study!&#8221; (http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/#comment-352753). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;If it&#8217;s true they are selectively blocking, I have to begrudgingly respect the skill with which they are playing this audience: there is no way for anyone to complain without matching the stereotypical conspiracist of the study!&#8221; (<a href="http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/#comment-352753" rel="nofollow">http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/#comment-352753</a>). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby White</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/#comment-353412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toby White]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 16:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=16759#comment-353412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Alexander K: I have to agree. I vacillate a lot; but I&#039;m inclined to think AGW exists and is likely (in the traditional sense of p &gt; 50%) to cause serious problems at some point in the not-too-distant future. However, I&#039;m now also convinced that the scientific warmer &quot;community&quot; (or &quot;nest,&quot; or &quot;infestation&quot;) has completely lost its collective mind. The really disturbing thought that preoccupies me, even as I become more confident of the reality and danger of AGW, is that the discounted harm caused by warmer corruption of science is becoming significantly greater than the discounted harm caused by AGW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alexander K: I have to agree. I vacillate a lot; but I&#8217;m inclined to think AGW exists and is likely (in the traditional sense of p &gt; 50%) to cause serious problems at some point in the not-too-distant future. However, I&#8217;m now also convinced that the scientific warmer &#8220;community&#8221; (or &#8220;nest,&#8221; or &#8220;infestation&#8221;) has completely lost its collective mind. The really disturbing thought that preoccupies me, even as I become more confident of the reality and danger of AGW, is that the discounted harm caused by warmer corruption of science is becoming significantly greater than the discounted harm caused by AGW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DGH</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/#comment-353385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DGH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 14:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=16759#comment-353385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was is my comment regarding John Cook&#039;s tweets stuck in moderation?
&lt;strong&gt;
Steve: multiple links triggers moderation in the Wordpress setting.&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was is my comment regarding John Cook&#8217;s tweets stuck in moderation?<br />
<strong><br />
Steve: multiple links triggers moderation in the WordPress setting.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Alberts</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2012/09/14/the-sks-link-to-the-lewandowsky-survey/#comment-353130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Alberts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=16759#comment-353130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually they used the Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski (sp), not Ted Bundy. The latter was a serial killer with a VW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually they used the Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski (sp), not Ted Bundy. The latter was a serial killer with a VW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
