Tag Archives: mmh

Conflicted Reviewers Distort Literature

The comments by James Annan and his reviewers here on McKitrick et al (2010) demonstrate very nicely how the literature gets distorted by the rejection of a simple comment showing that the application of Santer’s own method to updated data resulted in failure on key statistics. Annan and his commenters are worrying about the novelty […]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,297 other followers