Building Coalitions

Let no one say that we at climateaudit do not contribution to coalition building. In the bibliography to Wahl and Ammann [Clim Chg 2006], we see the following citation:

Wahl, E., Ritson, D. and Ammann, C. accepted, Reconstruction of century-scale temperature variations, Science

If you can’t get accepted at GRL, you can always try Science.


  1. Steve Bloom
    Posted Mar 6, 2006 at 3:46 PM | Permalink

    Do I detect the teensiest bit of snippiness in that post? I think we all know which is the more prestigious publication, and with a vastly larger readership. It’s a veritable hockey league. 🙂

    (BTW, the comment box is once again running slightly under the right column, at least as seen on my 800×600 monitor.)

  2. Steve McIntyre
    Posted Mar 6, 2006 at 3:58 PM | Permalink

    Perhaps a little snippy, but not the way you think. I have my share of faults, but publication address envy is not one of them.

    It’s just that I wasted a lot of time writing replies to comments by Ritson and by A&W – both of which were lousy comments and you’ve read lots here about them. I think that it’s pretty funny that they’ve found each other (and I suspect that CA helped them find each other.) I can hardly wait to see the joint product.

  3. muirgeo
    Posted Mar 6, 2006 at 8:08 PM | Permalink

    Or you could try Energy and Environment.

%d bloggers like this: