Josh: Andrew, Put on your big boy pants

 

 

Josh portrays what a sensible decision in Weaver v National Post would have looked like.

weaver big boy pants


9 Comments

  1. seanbrady
    Posted Mar 14, 2015 at 5:21 PM | Permalink

    Brilliant artwork! The expression on his face is priceless; it made me laugh out loud, literally.

  2. pax
    Posted Mar 14, 2015 at 6:45 PM | Permalink

    When humor is your brother in arms, you know that you’re with the good guys. Thank you Josh. Your contributions are priceless.

  3. Craig Loehle
    Posted Mar 14, 2015 at 6:53 PM | Permalink

    I know something about needing such pants. I have had my work discussed both here and on WUWT. I have had nice things said, mistaken things said, and mean (yes even sarcastic) things said. I never thought of suing anyone. I even later wrote a paper with Willis in spite of him really ripping one of my papers up. Of course mean things hurt one’s feelings. But there are hundreds of mean things one will see in reviews of one’s work–so toughen up if you are a scientist. It may also turn out sometimes that your pet theory is wrong.

  4. Jeff Norman
    Posted Mar 14, 2015 at 8:44 PM | Permalink

    How could you possibly know Weaver has red buttons on his shorts?[/Brandon]

    • Throgmorton.
      Posted Mar 15, 2015 at 1:17 AM | Permalink

      Shorts? Actually, they nearly reach his knees. The real issue here is the one green sock. If you cannot address the sock, then you have no credibility in discussing the shorts.[/Nick]

      • Posted Mar 15, 2015 at 11:13 AM | Permalink

        Long shorts have been the rage among 10-year-olds. Those wouldn’t qualify as long.

    • Throgmorton.
      Posted Mar 15, 2015 at 1:21 AM | Permalink

      Shoes. That is all.[/Mosher]

  5. sue
    Posted Mar 15, 2015 at 12:24 AM | Permalink

    🙂 Steve do you have a link to the original post by Josh?

    • cartoonsbyjosh
      Posted Mar 16, 2015 at 4:32 AM | Permalink

      This is the original post 😉

%d bloggers like this: