Josh portrays what a sensible decision in Weaver v National Post would have looked like.
Brilliant artwork! The expression on his face is priceless; it made me laugh out loud, literally.
When humor is your brother in arms, you know that you’re with the good guys. Thank you Josh. Your contributions are priceless.
I know something about needing such pants. I have had my work discussed both here and on WUWT. I have had nice things said, mistaken things said, and mean (yes even sarcastic) things said. I never thought of suing anyone. I even later wrote a paper with Willis in spite of him really ripping one of my papers up. Of course mean things hurt one’s feelings. But there are hundreds of mean things one will see in reviews of one’s work–so toughen up if you are a scientist. It may also turn out sometimes that your pet theory is wrong.
How could you possibly know Weaver has red buttons on his shorts?[/Brandon]
Shorts? Actually, they nearly reach his knees. The real issue here is the one green sock. If you cannot address the sock, then you have no credibility in discussing the shorts.[/Nick]
Long shorts have been the rage among 10-year-olds. Those wouldn’t qualify as long.
Shoes. That is all.[/Mosher]
🙂 Steve do you have a link to the original post by Josh?
This is the original post 😉