-
Tip Jar
-
Pages
-
Categories
-
Articles
-
Blogroll
- Accuweather Blogs
- Andrew Revkin
- Anthony Watts
- Bishop Hill
- Bob Tisdale
- Dan Hughes
- David Stockwell
- Icecap
- Idsos
- James Annan
- Jeff Id
- Josh Halpern
- Judith Curry
- Keith Kloor
- Klimazweibel
- Lubos Motl
- Lucia's Blackboard
- Matt Briggs
- NASA GISS
- Nature Blogs
- RealClimate
- Roger Pielke Jr
- Roger Pielke Sr
- Roman M
- Science of Doom
- Tamino
- Warwick Hughes
- Watts Up With That
- William Connolley
- WordPress.com
- World Climate Report
-
Favorite posts
-
Links
-
Weblogs and resources
-
Archives
Author Archives: Stephen McIntyre
IAC: “Such As McIntyre and McKitrick”
Jun 12, 2010 – 4:22 PM
Marcel Crok of the Netherlands had an interesting exchange with the Netherlands-based InterAcademy Council this week – see his blog post here. Noticing that the InterAcademy Council’s IPCC Review was holding hearings in Montreal and that presenters were being imported from Europe (e.g. Robert Watson, Hans von Storch), Marcel wrote to the IAC at 4 […]
Desmogging Desmog’s Trick – Part 1
Jun 11, 2010 – 3:11 PM
All too often writers like Morgan Goodwin at desmog here or Brian Angliss at S& R here think that tricks are a “good way to solve a problem” (as per Gavin Schmidt at realclimate.) In a recent post, Angliss moves the pea under the thimble, using an IPCC diagram to supposedly rebut a criticism of […]
British Due Diligence – Royal Society Style
Jun 10, 2010 – 2:59 PM
The Oxburgh “report” said that the eleven “representative” publications that it reviewed had been “selected on the advice of the Royal Society”. The eleven articles were so implausible a representation that it seemed scarcely credible that they could have been selected by any person with any expertise in the field. I asked the Royal Society […]
House of Lords c/o University of East Anglia
Jun 10, 2010 – 9:53 AM
In response to requests for mundane information such as the terms of reference of the Oxburgh Inquiry, Oxburgh pretty much laid down a gauntlet for an FOI inquiry, asserting that no relevant documents existed. I am afraid that I am not able to be very helpful as none of the documents about which you inquire […]
Supplemental Submission to Muir Russell
Jun 10, 2010 – 9:14 AM
The following was sent yesterday after I noticed that the April 22, 2010 minutes of the Muir Russell panel indicated a possible intent on their part to avoid consideration of IPCC activities by CRU employees, even though IPCC is how climate scientists speak to the world.
Oxburgh versus Emanuel
Jun 5, 2010 – 12:01 AM
In response to my inquiry asking for a copy of any document setting out the terms of reference of the inquiry, Lord Oxburgh stated: I am afraid that I am not able to be very helpful as none of the documents about which you inquire exists. And later: The only written record, apart from any […]
Muir Russell and the Oxburgh Embarrassment
Jun 4, 2010 – 11:54 PM
The April 1, 2010 Sir Muir minutes state: The Review noted the recommendation of the Science and Technology Panel that the Review and Lord Oxburgh’s Scientific Appraisal Panel should map their activities to ensure that there are no unmanaged overlaps. The Review agreed to follow this up by writing to Lord Oxburgh. I wonder if […]
Oxburgh Refuses to Answer
Jun 4, 2010 – 8:07 AM
I asked Ronald Oxburgh, chairman of what may be the most [self-snip] “inquiry” in recent experience, a few simple questions about the terms of reference and documentation of this “inquiry” – an “inquiry” in which, to their shame, Kerry Emanuel, David Hand, Herbert Huppert, Lisa Graumlich, Michael Kelly and Huw Davies, were complicit. Oxburgh sent […]
Losing Glacier Data
Jun 4, 2010 – 5:06 AM
On February 27, Gerald “winged it” North emailed me (and several other blogs) instructing us not to mention him in our blogs. Hi All, I would appreciate your leaving me out of your blogs. Jerry North If he wanted me to not mention him, a good starting point would be to stop saying stupid things. […]

